By R.L.C. Livera
The Port of Hambantota, also known as ‘Magampura’ is situated about 19 nautical miles north of the key shipping route between the Malacca Strait and the Suez Canal, which links Asia and Europe. Harbor is located at the mouth of Karagan Lewaya and occupies the entire area of the Lewaya. Immediate purpose of the project is to establish an oil import/bunkering terminal to cater to the needs of ship bunkering at the route south of Sri Lanka, in long term port will be developed as a major industrial port in the Southern Province in Sri Lanka and to become one of the major multipurpose ports and be a gateway to India and surrounding countries.
Environmental Impact Assessment was carried out for systematic identification, prediction and evaluation of the project on physical, chemical, biological, cultural, socio-economic components of the environment and to incorporate environmentally sound development during planning and decision making process. EIA process of this project was carried out in accordance with the specific requirements of the Sri Lanka EIA process, as set out in the Terms of Reference (ToR) issued by the Coastal Conservation Department of Sri Lanka.
The project of Hambantota Sea Port consist of main four phases as initial phase (2010), short term phase (2015), medium term phase (2025), long term phase (beyond 2040). From these the initial phase was completed in 2011 which was initiated in 15th January 2008. The estimated cost of this phase was US$ 361 million.
In the EIA report the environment characteristics existed in the project area before initiation of the project is analyzed according to physical environment, ecological environment and socio-economic environment. And the impacts associated with project are also mentioned in three categories as physical impacts, socio- economic and ecological impacts. Mitigatory measures which are planned to be adopted are also analyzed in the EIA report to minimize the impacts in construction, planning and operating stages.
Physical impacts
|
Mitigatory measures adopted
|
Deterioration of coastal water quality due to
dredging and excavation work of breakwaters and jetties (Construction phase)
|
All dredging activities and dumping of dredging
material was carried out when the wave climate was not too severe(during NE
Monsoon period)
Avoid exposure of released material to direct air to
minimize volatilization of organic chemicals
|
Disposal of excavated materials and other debris
arising during construction (Construction phase)
|
These sediments were utilized for land reclamation
purposes as a filling material
|
Impacts at the quarry sites with dust emission
(Construction phase)
|
Minimized by wetting and wet spraying of dusty
surfaces, carefully stockpiling construction and quarry materials to avoid
unnecessary dust and covering against wind and rain. All quarrying activities
were carried out in consultation with GSMB under provisions of Mine and
Minerals Act No 33 of 1992
|
Impacts on air and water quality
|
Counting air blast over pressure and water quality
measurement periodically
|
Impacts on coastal water quality due to spillage of
construction materials (Construction
phase)
|
Reduce possible spillage of grease, oil leaks from
vehicles, earth moving equipment, hydraulic machinery and washing of
unprotected core materials of breakwaters and jetties. Effects are temporary,
materials rapidly settles
|
Impacts from noise and vibrations at quarry site
from rock blasting, vibrations, shocks from blasting and construction
activities such as pile driving and blasting (Construction phase)
|
Quarry sites are not located in the vicinity of
noise and vibration sensitive areas, especially residential areas
Explosive activities prohibited to avoid significant
damage to buildings
Noise generating equipment restricted only during
day time and special vibration less techniques
|
Ecological Impacts
|
Mitigatory measures adopted
|
Impacts on marine ecology
(construction phase)
|
Vibration less rock blasting
methods were adopted, construction machinery and vessels were well maintained
to prevent leakage of oil, fuel and lubricants.
|
Impacts on survival of birds
and wildlife in Karagam Lewaya, important wetland habitat (construction and
operational phase)
|
No dumping of dredged
material in open areas to avoid impacts on birds and wildlife
|
Impacts on terrestrial fauna
from dumping of household waste, waste generated by workforce, waste water
and sewage (construction and operational phase)
|
Facilitate for waste water
disposal in worker’s quarters, canteens and avoid contamination of Karagam
Lewaya and immediate sea environment , semi or fully automated solid waste
collection systems
|
Socio-economic Impacts
|
Mitigatory measures adopted
|
Relocation and resettlement of residences
(Construction phase)
|
The valuation department has valued their properties
(lands, houses and etc.) and paid compensations and also given land lots in a
different locations
|
Impacts on agriculture (Construction and Operational
phase)
|
Not much impact on agriculture in the project area
as agriculture is not much done in project area
|
Impacts on archeological sites (Construction and
Operational phase)
|
No specific sites of interest have been identified
with the area subject to major constructions work both in land and sea.
|
Impacts on fishing community
|
No difficulty for fishermen to continue their
fishing activities in the sea area close to the harbour. Only a small area of
coastal belt was disturbed due to the development activities. Affected
fishermen were identified and paid off with compensation under Phase 1 of the
project.
|
Impacts from movement of sea water /fresh water
interface in land
|
Lands cannot be used for cultivation therefore can
be used for other purposes such as development of industrial zone
|
Impacts from noise and vibrations related to traffic
|
Proper traffic management, proper vehicle
maintenance
|
Cost and benefit analysis done for the project is also included in the report in order to measure the costs and benefits associated with the port development project.
There are both negative and positive impacts from the Hambantota Sea Port. Positive impacts from the project are new employment opportunities, Development of infrastructure in the area, improvement of quality of life, resettlement of residents with better facilities, contribution to economic growth , development of tourism in the area, increased capacity for port traffic requirements, enhance export earnings via improvement of maritime transportation and establishment of export companies, attraction of foreign investment.
But there are many negative impacts also such as destruction of terrestrial habitats of flora and fauna, irreversible impacts from alteration of Karagam Lewaya in to the sea port, negative impression on tourists by destruction of wildlife and habitats of Sri Lanka, problems in achieving anticipated costs and benefits by the Government, high interest rates for resettlement of loans taken for development of Hambantota Sea Port from China EXIM bank, additional expenses for vehicle importers to transport vehicles from Hambantota to areas such as Colombo, Kandy, Kurunegala etc., no charges are charged for unloading of vehicles, therefore less income for SLPA.
No comments:
Post a Comment